Automated Testing vs. Manuel Testing: Which One Is Better?

Software testing is one of the most crucial aspects of the software development process. When we compare two testing methods, it is better to analyze your needs first. Thus, let’s see which one is better: Automated Testing vs. Manuel Testing.

Although automated testing is an invaluable asset for companies, it is a good practice to complement automated testing with manual testing.

Automated tests are widely accepted as a great tool for identifying basic code errors and functions, but in order to emulate user experience and maintain the general feel of the application, manual testing is necessary. A great percentage of test automation tools are not able to give sufficient information on errors that occur outside the code, such as slow response time or lack of user guidance throughout the application. By using human intelligence and knowledge of the project, it is easier to detect these defects with manual testing.

Manual testing also has disadvantages, though. Two of the biggest drawbacks are that it is a bit time-consuming and is subject to human error. This is where test automation comes into play, it does not require a lot of time, and some errors can be identified before even the manual testing process begins, reducing the risk of human error.

To conclude, both methods are required for a vigorous quality assurance process, and how to choose between manual and automated testing is one of the most important steps of software development.